🔗 Share this article

A number of Fortnite enthusiasts are feeling let down, and this isn't due to recent virtual events. The game's newest limited-time event, which brings a Simpsons-themed world, also rolled out a fresh mechanic called pets. It's impossible to ignore that the new pets are adorable. However, the associated prices have left many players stunned at this developer's attempts to profit from nearly every part of the gaming experience.

Understanding Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are essentially similar to digital creatures, but with some limitations. You can give them a name, and these pets will accompany your character throughout a game. They are indestructible, and you can pet them. Opposing players outside the player's party are unable to see sidekicks — and displaying one's animal friends is perhaps half the enjoyment of having them. Sidekicks are able to be outfitted with outfits and emotes, however the controversy centers on their appearance. Each pet's main appearance is only able to be changed once, after which that selection is final. Players can choose a sidekick's fur shade, accent hues, eye colors, pattern, and its build size.

The Costly Personalization System

Should a player later choose that they'd like their sidekick to appear slightly different, it's not possible to simply continue to modify the appearance. Players must purchase another companion. Furthermore, sidekicks aren't cheap. Most players are obtaining the banana-themed sidekick, since it's packaged in the current battle pass. Based on unofficial reports, future pets could be priced at from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks is priced at $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks are $22.99. You can change the name of a sidekick as many times as you'd like.

Community Reaction and Parallels

Most sidekicks haven't been officially launched so far, meaning the pricing may well be adjusted. But even if the company makes companions cheaper, a lot of the anger stems from the fact that gamers could have to spend for a one type of pet more than once. For some, the pricing scheme seems especially egregious considering the developer has previously added pets that ride about inside backpack accessories. Back bling pets do not have a restriction on changes and can be seen by other participants in the match. Back bling pets cannot be named or perform gestures, however other gamers are able to occasionally interact with them — and this is better than remaining invisible altogether.

The absence of unique features and restricted engagement choices have numerous players experiencing disappointed. Why can't you, for example, play fetch with their stylish fruit-themed pet? A few point out that sidekicks do not always stay close with the player if a game is moving quickly, or mention that Peels takes up two slots in the reward system — and this supports the notion that the company is squeezing players for revenue. Profit-driven is a term that's appearing frequently in such discussions, with some comparing sidekick monetization to other aggressive pricing schemes in games like EA Sports FC. It also doesn't help that certain sidekicks are expected to be more expensive than equivalent outfit counterparts.

"PLEASE avoid buy Companion Pets," pleads a highly-voted community thread that encourages fellow gamers to figuratively express disapproval by not spending.

"We understand they're adorable," the post continues, "I know they are enjoyable. I know everyone has been anticipating them. But the monetization focus being shown is unacceptable and must not be supported."

The Broader Picture of Virtual Spending

Over the past few years, Fortnite's events and collaborations have expanded in scale and aspiration, yet the no-cost-to-start title continues to needs to generate revenue. Therefore, the sheer quantity of items users are able to now purchase has grown nearly excessive. In addition to basics like back accessories, deployment tools, pickaxes, and gestures, you could possibly spend money on footwear, songs, instruments, building blocks, vehicles, wheels, vehicle drift colors, seasonal rewards, and a membership. Companion pets not only cost payment, and also bring in a host of fresh revenue avenues for the company. It is likely, players will before long be in a position to spend for items like pet looks, outfits, gestures, and additional engagement options.

All of these customization items are entirely voluntary and not necessary to enjoy the game, yet equipment can still affect your community experience. Kids, for instance, at times encounter teasing for not wearing impressive sufficiently cool skins. A comparable situation also transpired when the developer launched brand-name kicks, which can range from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The footwear cost model wasn't popular as well, and a few players vowed that they wouldn't fall prey to the pressure at the time. However in the end, purchasing footwear grew commonplace. Today, companion pets are further pushing the boundaries of what a player could be willing to pay to be distinctive amongst the player base.

What's Ahead for Companion Pets?

Sidekicks are currently a relatively recent addition, and they exist a game that changes frequently. A few players are reporting that they've gotten a survey that assesses how people feel about sidekick functionality and pricing, and this might possibly mean that the developer's plans are remain subject to change. But if the game shoes are any indication, sidekicks likely won't get more affordable overall — there will just be a wider selection of prices to choose from.

After all, where some players are expressing anger at the game item costs, others are experiencing only joy for their competitive friends.